Source-linked governance research
Solana Stake Pool DAO & Governance Tracker
Four current stake-pool projects in this review expose public token governance. A fifth active tracker, Sanctum, is associated infrastructure for rkuSOL rather than the controller of the pool. The other projects use receipt tokens, corporate or multisig administration, utility tokens without voting rights, or no verified public DAO.
Tracker summary
- Total records
- 18
- Registry, supplemental, associated, and historical
- Current registry
- 15
- Programs in the delegation landscape
- Current pool governance
- 4
- Public token governance confirmed
- Active trackers
- 5
- Including associated Sanctum governance
Classification boundary
A token is not automatically a DAO
This tracker records what each asset does, not merely that it exists. The classifications are evidence labels for this research, not legal characterizations of a token or project.
- Receipt / LST token
- A tokenized accounting or redemption claim connected to staked SOL. Holding an LST does not automatically grant proposal or voting rights.
- Governance token
- A token with an explicitly documented role in proposals, votes, delegation, gauges, or another project governance process.
- Utility token
- An asset used for access, payment, staking, rewards, or protocol economics. Utility alone is not governance.
- Voting power
- The balance a governance system actually counts. Locking, delegation, duration multipliers, or voter-stake registries can make it differ from a wallet's free token balance.
- Incentive token
- Points, options, rewards, or other benefits intended to influence participation. An incentive is not a governance right unless the project documents one.
Monitoring shortlist
Five active governance trackers
These are the systems with current public governance activity or an active governance mechanism. Sanctum is kept visibly separate as infrastructure associated with rkuSOL.
Registry
SolBlaze
SBGP-0018 passed in April 2026 and changed Verified Validators delegation and incentive design; gauge voting remains a separate continuous governance surface.
Activity observed 2026-04-19
How to participate: Deposit BLZE into SolBlaze Governance, configure the intended VSR lockup, and use the Realms proposal portal or SolBlaze gauges. Review lock duration and exit behavior before signing.
Registry
The Vault
Seven-day gauge epochs were active and determined allocation of the documented 10% gauge share of undirected stake.
Activity observed 2026-08-15
How to participate: Lock V for veV and vote through the published Tribeca gauge portal. Validators can also pursue permissionless directed stake or separate Validator Board review.
Registry
Marinade
MIP-23 was published for forum feedback on 2026-08-14. No Realms vote link, approval, effective epoch, or implementation was verified on 2026-08-15.
Activity observed 2026-08-14
How to participate: Lock MNDE for veMNDE, optionally delegate voting power, discuss MIPs on the forum, and vote through Marinade's Realms governance.
Registry
Jito
JIP-38, Confirm Jito as a Token-Centric Network, was the latest official proposal signal in this snapshot.
Activity observed 2026-07-21
How to participate: Hold or delegate JTO voting power, discuss JIPs on the forum, and vote through Jito's governance portal. Verify the current constitution and thresholds before participation.
Associated infrastructure
Sanctum
CLOUD-007 proposed one final 15m CLOUD distribution round through ASR.
Activity observed 2026-08-12
How to participate: Review active markets and participate through Sanctum's official voting interface, subject to the current futarchy mechanics and market risks.
Unified dataset
All pool and project governance records
Filter the full set by research scope or governance class. Every card preserves tokens, canonical addresses where verified, participation paths, current activity, treasury evidence, caveats, and official sources.
Registry
Phase
Phase liquid staking
- Model
- No public governance mechanism
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
Phase exposes staking tokens and a bonded validator intake, but no public token-voting DAO, proposal portal, or DAO treasury was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
pdSOL — Phase delegated SOL
Solana · Live
Mint:
aeroXvCT6tjGVNyTvZy86tFDwE4sYsKCh7FbNDcrcxFStaking receipt; no public governance rights were verified.
YIELD — Phase YIELD
Solana · Live
No canonical mint or contract address is published in the checked sources.
Presented by Phase as a staking/LST product, not a governance token.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- The public participation route is the Phase validator application and refundable Phase Bond, not governance voting.
- Latest checked activity
- The validator delegation program and bonded application flow were live; no public DAO activity was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public Phase DAO treasury was identified. A protocol-controlled pool or bond account must not be relabeled as a DAO treasury without an official governance source.
Caveats
- Receipt or staking tokens are not evidence of governance rights.
- The Phase Bond is an application mechanism, not a governance position.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
JPool
JSOL stake pool
- Model
- Administrative multisig
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
JPool documents administrative control protected by a Squads 2-of-3 multisig. No JPool governance token or public DAO proposal system was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
JSOL — JPool staked SOL
Solana · Live
Mint:
7Q2afV64in6N6SeZsAAB81TJzwDoD6zpqmHkzi9DcavnLiquid-staking receipt token, not a governance token.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validators can use JPool delegation and incentive paths; JSOL holders do not receive documented protocol voting rights.
- Latest checked activity
- JPool delegation and Incentive Campaigns were live; governance remained administrative rather than token-voted.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. Official security documentation describes protected administrative keys. A Squads multisig improves operational key security but is not, by itself, a public token DAO.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- JSOL is an LST receipt token.
- JPoints, incentives, and membership programs are not documented as governance voting power.
- JPool's SIMD dashboard concerns Solana validator governance, not governance of JPool itself.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
SolBlaze
BlazeStake / bSOL
- Model
- Proposal DAO + gauges
- Public token governance
- Confirmed
SolBlaze operates a public Realms DAO with proposal voting and recurring gauges. BLZE lockups produce veBLZE governance power.
- Receipt / LST tokens
bSOL — BlazeStake staked SOL
Solana · Live
Mint:
bSo13r4TkiE4KumL71LsHTPpL2euBYLFx6h9HP3piy1Liquid-staking receipt token; BLZE/veBLZE carries governance power.
- Governance / voting tokens
BLZE — SolBlaze governance token
Solana · Live
Mint:
BLZEEuZUBVqFhj8adcCFPJvPVCiCyVmh3hkJMrU8KuJABLZE can be locked through Realms VSR to obtain veBLZE voting power.
veBLZE — Vote-escrowed BLZE
Solana · Live
No canonical mint or contract address is published in the checked sources.
Non-transferable voting power derived from a BLZE lockup.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Deposit BLZE into SolBlaze Governance, configure the intended VSR lockup, and use the Realms proposal portal or SolBlaze gauges. Review lock duration and exit behavior before signing.
- Latest checked activity
- SBGP-0018 passed in April 2026 and changed Verified Validators delegation and incentive design; gauge voting remains a separate continuous governance surface.
- Treasury evidence
- No public DAO treasury verified. The Realms DAO and public proposal history are verifiable. No single official live treasury address and current balance were verified for this snapshot; proposal authority is not a live balance report.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- bSOL is an LST receipt token, not the governance token.
- Lockups can be long-lived; a Constant VSR lockup does not behave like a simple fixed unlock date.
- The 5m veBLZE validator-program threshold is an eligibility rule, not guaranteed delegation.
Official and primary sources
- SolBlaze Governance on Realms ↗
- SolBlaze governance proposals ↗
- SolBlaze gauges ↗
- Verified Validators application ↗
- Official token addresses ↗
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
DynoSol
dynoSOL stake pool
- Model
- Curated or algorithmic operator
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
DynoSol publishes a curated validator intake and delegation process, but no public governance token, DAO proposal portal, or token-voting mechanism was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
dynoSOL — DynoSol liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
DYNoyS3x5qgbccZg7RPXagm4xQzfnm5iwd9o8pMyJtdELiquid-staking receipt token; no public voting rights were verified.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validator participation uses DynoSol's official validator/stats section and application rather than DAO voting.
- Latest checked activity
- The stake pool and validator intake were active; no public DAO activity was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public DynoSol DAO treasury was identified. Pool-controlled stake is not evidence of a DAO treasury.
Caveats
- dynoSOL is an LST receipt token, not verified governance power.
Registry
DoubleZero
DoubleZero Delegation Program
- Model
- Foundation-led utility protocol
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
DoubleZero has a live 2Z utility token and Foundation-led protocol processes, but its official token disclosure explicitly says 2Z does not provide voting rights.
- Receipt / LST tokens
- None documented.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
2Z — DoubleZero utility token
Solana · Live
Mint:
J6pQQ3FAcJQeWPPGppWRb4nM8jU3wLyYbRrLh7feMfvdUsed for network access, payments, rewards, staking, and delegation; official disclosure excludes token-holder voting rights.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Network and DZDP participation follow DoubleZero's published technical and eligibility paths; holding 2Z is not a DAO vote.
- Latest checked activity
- The network, 2Z utility, and DZDP were active, with community feedback channels for economics but no token-voting DAO.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No token-governed DoubleZero DAO treasury was identified. Foundation allocations or protocol reward accounts must not be presented as a DAO treasury when 2Z has no voting rights.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- A live protocol token does not necessarily confer governance rights.
- Community feedback on economics is not the same as binding token voting.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
Definity
definSOL stake pool
- Model
- Curated or algorithmic operator
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
Definity uses an operator whitelist, geographic diversity logic, and direct staking, but no public token DAO was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
definSOL — Definity liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
DEF1NXSZ8Th9n28hYBayrFtx9bj1EwwTiy3mhHEB9oyALiquid-staking receipt token; no public governance rights were verified.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validators participate through the public whitelist application and operational eligibility review, not token voting.
- Latest checked activity
- The whitelist, validator list, and direct-staking product were live; no public DAO activity was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public Definity DAO treasury was identified. Whitelist administration and matching reserves are not a DAO treasury.
Caveats
- definSOL is an LST receipt token, not verified governance power.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
JagPool
jagSOL stake pool
- Model
- Curated or algorithmic operator
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
JagPool publishes validator criteria and an application process. No public governance token, proposal portal, or binding token-voting mechanism was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
jagSOL — JagPool liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
jag58eRBC1c88LaAsRPspTMvoKJPbnzw9p9fREzHqyVLiquid-staking receipt token; directed stake is not documented as DAO voting.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validators apply through JagPool's documented process and capacity-dependent waitlist.
- Latest checked activity
- The pool and application process were active; no public DAO proposal activity was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public JagPool DAO treasury was identified. Regional budgets or directed stake are not a DAO treasury without a published authority model.
Caveats
- Generic use of the word governance does not establish who can propose, vote, or execute decisions.
- jagSOL-directed staking is not, by itself, protocol governance.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
StarPool
StarSOL stake pool
- Model
- Curated or algorithmic operator
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
StarPool publishes a stake-pool strategy and StarSOL mint, but no StarPool DAO, proposal portal, or project governance token was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
StarSOL — StarPool liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
STARxPuRLr3R6huwJ2ppqoTZ65WtA6S2unEzYiYV8bhLiquid-staking receipt token; no StarPool voting mechanism was verified.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validators use the public application and StarPool's published selection strategy rather than token governance.
- Latest checked activity
- The pool and validator application were active; no public DAO activity was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public StarPool DAO treasury was identified. A stake-pool reserve or token account must not be described as a DAO treasury without published governance authority.
Caveats
- StarSOL is an LST receipt token.
- Generic references to using an asset in governance do not prove a StarPool governance system.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
Edgevana
edgeSOL stake pool
- Model
- Corporate governance
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
Edgevana operates an infrastructure-gated, algorithmically ranked staking product. No public edgeSOL DAO or token-voting portal was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
edgeSOL — Edgevana liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
edge86g9cVz87xcpKpy3J77vbp4wYd9idEV562CCnttLiquid-staking receipt token; no token-holder protocol voting was verified.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validator participation depends on Edgevana infrastructure and the published delegation algorithm, not governance-token ownership.
- Latest checked activity
- The staking site and delegation documentation remained live; no public DAO activity was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public Edgevana token-governed treasury was identified. Corporate or product-controlled accounts are not a DAO treasury.
Caveats
- edgeSOL is an LST receipt token, not verified governance power.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
SolStrategies
STKESOL stake pool
- Model
- Corporate governance
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
SolStrategies is a public corporation operating a stake-pool product. Its shareholder and board governance must not be described as a crypto token DAO.
- Receipt / LST tokens
STKESOL — SolStrategies liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
stke7uu3fXHsGqKVVjKnkmj65LRPVrqr4bLG2SJg7rhLiquid-staking receipt token issued by a public company, not a governance token.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validator selection is algorithmic under the published delegation strategy; corporate voting, where available, belongs to shareholders rather than STKESOL holders.
- Latest checked activity
- The STKESOL pool and corporate operations were active; no token-voting protocol DAO was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. The operator is a corporation, not a token-governed DAO. Corporate assets and shareholder-governed capital must not be relabeled as a DAO treasury.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- STKESOL is an LST receipt token.
- HODL and STKE are public-market stock tickers, not crypto governance tokens for the stake pool.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
The Vault
vSOL stake pool
- Model
- Limited-scope gauge voting
- Public token governance
- Confirmed
The Vault has live V-to-veV gauge governance. Weekly votes direct the gauge share of undirected stake, but a general token-voted proposal system controlling every protocol function was not verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
vSOL — Vault liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
vSoLxydx6akxyMD9XEcPvGYNGq6Nn66oqVb3UkGkei7Liquid-staking receipt token; V/veV carries the documented gauge power.
- Governance / voting tokens
V — Vault governance and incentives token
Solana · Live
Mint:
VAULTVXqi93aaq9FsyPKgdgp6Ge1H1HoSvNC4ZbqFDsCan be locked to create veV for gauge voting.
veV — Vote-escrowed V
Solana · Live
No canonical mint or contract address is published in the checked sources.
Time-weighted voting power used by Vault gauges.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
vPTS — Vault Points
Solana · Live
Mint:
vpts3YVchXD2i6ivVEZLQ9Y1kzifTNpFoja7zfKr4eGPoints/options program asset; it is not the governance token.
- Participation path
- Lock V for veV and vote through the published Tribeca gauge portal. Validators can also pursue permissionless directed stake or separate Validator Board review.
- Latest checked activity
- Seven-day gauge epochs were active and determined allocation of the documented 10% gauge share of undirected stake.
- Treasury evidence
- Published token allocation. Launch tokenomics allocate 35% of the 100m V supply to a DAO Treasury. The launch allocation is not a verified live address or current balance, and gauge power must not be overstated as full control of the protocol.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- vSOL is an LST receipt token and vPTS is a points/options asset.
- Tribeca and VoteX are governance tooling and markets, not controllers of The Vault.
- The Validator Board is a separate community-selection surface from V/veV gauges.
Official and primary sources
- Vault launch tokenomics ↗
- Vault gauges ↗
- Vault gauge portal ↗
- VoteX Vault overview ↗
- Officially linked V-vSOL pool ↗
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
Layer33
IndieSOL stake pool
- Model
- Curated or algorithmic operator
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
Layer33 describes a curated independent-validator coalition and IndieSOL stake pool. Neither IndieSOL nor the related ORE incentive is documented as a Layer33 governance token.
- Receipt / LST tokens
IndieSOL — Layer33 liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
L33mHftsNpaj39z1omnGbGbuA5eKqSsbmr91rjTod48Liquid-staking receipt token for the curated Layer33 coalition.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
ORE — ORE
Solana · Live
Mint:
oreoU2P8bN6jkk3jbaiVxYnG1dCXcYxwhwyK9jSybcpRelated ecosystem incentive asset; no authority over Layer33 or IndieSOL governance was verified.
- Participation path
- Validator participation is curated outreach based on operator fit and contribution, not a public token vote.
- Latest checked activity
- The coalition and IndieSOL product were active; no public DAO proposal system was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public Layer33 or IndieSOL DAO treasury was identified. An incentive relationship or token distribution does not establish governance authority over the stake pool.
Caveats
- IndieSOL is an LST receipt token.
- ORE is tracked as a related incentive, not as a Layer33 governance token or DAO.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
Marinade
Marinade staking and mSOL
- Model
- Proposal DAO
- Public token governance
- Confirmed
Marinade has an active public DAO with Realms voting, forum deliberation, delegated veMNDE power, and documented authority over treasury and protocol domains alongside a scoped Council.
- Receipt / LST tokens
mSOL — Marinade staked SOL
Solana · Live
Mint:
mSoLzYCxHdYgdzU16g5QSh3i5K3z3KZK7ytfqcJm7SoLiquid-staking receipt token; MNDE/veMNDE carries governance power.
- Governance / voting tokens
MNDE — Marinade governance token
Solana · Live
Mint:
MNDEFzGvMt87ueuHvVU9VcTqsAP5b3fTGPsHuuPA5eyMNDE can be locked to obtain veMNDE voting power.
veMNDE — Vote-escrowed MNDE
Solana · Live
No canonical mint or contract address is published in the checked sources.
Locked governance power used for proposals, voting, and delegation.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Lock MNDE for veMNDE, optionally delegate voting power, discuss MIPs on the forum, and vote through Marinade's Realms governance.
- Latest checked activity
- MIP-23 was published for forum feedback on 2026-08-14. No Realms vote link, approval, effective epoch, or implementation was verified on 2026-08-15.
- Treasury evidence
- Verified on-chain governance. Official governance documentation assigns treasury and program domains to Realms governance. Treasury balances are dynamic, and the Marinade Council retains documented operational scope; verify current accounts and proposal execution on-chain.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- mSOL is an LST receipt token, not governance power.
- The governance and Council authority split should be tracked as it changes.
- MIP-23 is a forum proposal, not current policy. Official PSR documentation retains the validator 50%-99% / Marinade below-50% downtime split and 1% grace period.
- If adopted, MIP-23 would move the full compensable 0%-99% downtime range to validator bonds for SAM-delegated stake, with at least three epochs' notice; Marinade Select is outside the proposal's scope.
- Marinade's protected-events API reproduces 186.9 SOL funded by the reserve across 131 downtime settlements involving 72 validators since epoch 696, about 12.0% of total downtime compensation. PSR is bond-funded staker compensation, not Solana slashing.
Official and primary sources
- Marinade governance ↗
- MNDE token ↗
- Marinade forum ↗
- MIP-23 ↗
- Current PSR coverage ↗
- Protected-events API ↗
- Contract addresses ↗
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
Jito
JitoSOL stake pool
- Model
- Proposal DAO
- Public token governance
- Confirmed
Jito operates an active public DAO with forum discussion, a custom Realms deployment, delegated JTO voting power, a constitution, and Jito Foundation interfaces.
- Receipt / LST tokens
JitoSOL — Jito staked SOL
Solana · Live
Mint:
J1toso1uCk3RLmjorhTtrVwY9HJ7X8V9yYac6Y7kGCPnLiquid-staking receipt token; JTO carries governance power.
- Governance / voting tokens
JTO — Jito governance token
Solana · Live
Mint:
jtojtomepa8beP8AuQc6eXt5FriJwfFMwQx2v2f9mCLGovernance token used for Jito proposal voting and delegation.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Hold or delegate JTO voting power, discuss JIPs on the forum, and vote through Jito's governance portal. Verify the current constitution and thresholds before participation.
- Latest checked activity
- JIP-38, Confirm Jito as a Token-Centric Network, was the latest official proposal signal in this snapshot.
- Treasury evidence
- Verified on-chain governance. Official JTO documentation assigns community-growth tokens and governance responsibilities to the Realms DAO. Published allocations are not live treasury balances; current authorities, veto rules, and executed transfers must be verified on-chain.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- JitoSOL is an LST receipt token, not governance power.
- Jito uses a custom Realms deployment, so generic shared-Realms indexing may be incomplete.
- Proposal thresholds, voting periods, and veto rules can change through later constitutional proposals.
Official and primary sources
- Jito governance ↗
- Jito governance portal ↗
- Jito governance forum ↗
- JIP-38 ↗
- JTO governance token ↗
- JitoSOL deployed programs and mint ↗
Record verified 2026-08-15
Registry
Shinobi
xSHIN stake pool
- Model
- Curated or algorithmic operator
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
Shinobi xSHIN is a performance-selected stake pool. No public xSHIN DAO, governance token, or proposal portal was verified.
- Receipt / LST tokens
xSHIN — Shinobi liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
xSoL18r4U1k2ALa4yF857VDZJqCKecLtty92nscre3oLiquid-staking receipt token; no Shinobi governance rights were verified.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validator inclusion is based on observable performance history rather than a token-voted application.
- Latest checked activity
- The xSHIN pool and performance strategy were active; no public DAO proposal activity was found.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public Shinobi DAO treasury was identified. Stake-pool accounts are not a DAO treasury.
Caveats
- xSHIN is an LST receipt token.
- A generic glossary definition of governance token does not establish that xSHIN is one.
Supplemental
Raiku
rkuSOL
- Model
- No public governance mechanism
- Public token governance
- Not confirmed
rkuSOL is live as a staking receipt, while Raiku's referenced future token had no verified live mint, voting system, or public DAO in this snapshot.
- Receipt / LST tokens
rkuSOL — Raiku liquid-staking token
Solana · Live
Mint:
rkubjTrZYioRSeXwDnhwGQzvW3qkcin72JSxUt3WMVpLiquid-staking receipt token launched with Sanctum infrastructure.
- Governance / voting tokens
- None documented.
- Utility tokens
RAIKU — Raiku token
Solana · Planned
No canonical mint or contract address is published in the checked sources.
Official material said a token would be introduced; no live mint or public DAO was verified.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Validators follow Raiku's operator and pilot intake. There is currently no verified Raiku token-governance participation path.
- Latest checked activity
- rkuSOL and validator onboarding materials were live; the Raiku token remained a future statement rather than verified governance.
- Treasury evidence
- Not applicable. No public Raiku token-governed treasury was identified. Sanctum's infrastructure and DAO must not be treated as governance of rkuSOL unless an authority relationship is explicitly documented.
Caveats
- rkuSOL is an LST receipt token, not a governance token.
- Do not publish a RAIKU mint until an official live token source verifies it.
- Sanctum powers rkuSOL infrastructure but its CLOUD holders do not thereby govern rkuSOL.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Associated infrastructure
Sanctum
CLOUD governance and LST infrastructure
- Model
- Futarchy
- Public token governance
- Confirmed
Sanctum has active CLOUD futarchy governance and provides infrastructure related to rkuSOL, but Sanctum governance must not be presented as governance of Raiku or rkuSOL.
- Receipt / LST tokens
- None documented.
- Governance / voting tokens
CLOUD — Sanctum governance token
Solana · Live
Mint:
CLoUDKc4Ane7HeQcPpE3YHnznRxhMimJ4MyaUqyHFzAuUsed in Sanctum futarchy governance; no authority over Raiku's validator selection was verified.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- Review active markets and participate through Sanctum's official voting interface, subject to the current futarchy mechanics and market risks.
- Latest checked activity
- CLOUD-007 proposed one final 15m CLOUD distribution round through ASR.
- Treasury evidence
- Published token allocation. CLOUD governance proposals publicly cover token distributions and protocol decisions. A proposal amount is not a live treasury balance, and Sanctum treasury authority does not imply control over rkuSOL.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- Sanctum is tracked because it supplies related LST infrastructure, not because it is a registry stake pool.
- CLOUD governance does not automatically govern rkuSOL validator selection or Raiku operations.
- Futarchy participation has market and execution mechanics distinct from one-token-one-vote proposals.
Official and primary sources
- CLOUD token disclosure ↗
- Sanctum governance design ↗
- Sanctum governance research ↗
- Sanctum voting portal ↗
- CLOUD-007 ↗
Record verified 2026-08-15
Historical
Lido
Lido on Solana / stSOL
- Model
- Historical DAO-managed product
- Public token governance
- Confirmed
Lido DAO remains active across the broader protocol, but Lido on Solana was sunset and stSOL is a historical product rather than a current Solana stake-pool opportunity.
- Receipt / LST tokens
stSOL — Lido staked SOL
Solana · Historical
Mint:
7dHbWXmci3dT8UFYWYZweBLXgycu7Y3iL6trKn1Y7ARjHistorical Solana liquid-staking receipt; the Solana product was wound down.
- Governance / voting tokens
LDO — Lido DAO governance token
Ethereum · Live
Contract:
0x5A98FcBEA516Cf06857215779Fd812CA3beF1B32Governance token for the broader Lido DAO, not an active Solana delegation route.
- Utility tokens
- None documented.
- Incentive tokens
- None documented.
- Participation path
- LDO holders can follow the broader Lido DAO. There is no active Lido on Solana validator-intake or delegation path to track.
- Latest checked activity
- Lido on Solana completed its sunset path; the broader Lido DAO continues independently of the closed Solana product.
- Treasury evidence
- Historical / product closed. The Solana product was governed through Lido DAO before its approved sunset. Current Lido DAO treasury activity belongs to the broader protocol and must not be attributed to a live Solana stake pool.Treasury source ↗
Caveats
- stSOL and Lido on Solana are historical.
- Active LDO governance does not make the closed Solana product an actionable delegation target.
Official and primary sources
Record verified 2026-08-15
Negative evidence matters
Pools without verified public token governance
These records prevent common category errors: a receipt token, an administrative multisig, corporate ownership, directed stake, points, or a utility token does not prove a DAO. “No public DAO found” means no qualifying mechanism was verified in the checked sources; it is not proof that no private governance arrangement exists.
Phase
pdSOL · YIELD
No public DAO found
Phase exposes staking tokens and a bonded validator intake, but no public token-voting DAO, proposal portal, or DAO treasury was verified.
JPool
JSOL
Non-DAO administration
JPool documents administrative control protected by a Squads 2-of-3 multisig. No JPool governance token or public DAO proposal system was verified.
DynoSol
dynoSOL
No public DAO found
DynoSol publishes a curated validator intake and delegation process, but no public governance token, DAO proposal portal, or token-voting mechanism was verified.
DoubleZero
2Z
Token without voting rights
DoubleZero has a live 2Z utility token and Foundation-led protocol processes, but its official token disclosure explicitly says 2Z does not provide voting rights.
Definity
definSOL
No public DAO found
Definity uses an operator whitelist, geographic diversity logic, and direct staking, but no public token DAO was verified.
JagPool
jagSOL
No public DAO found
JagPool publishes validator criteria and an application process. No public governance token, proposal portal, or binding token-voting mechanism was verified.
StarPool
StarSOL
No public DAO found
StarPool publishes a stake-pool strategy and StarSOL mint, but no StarPool DAO, proposal portal, or project governance token was verified.
Edgevana
edgeSOL
Non-DAO administration
Edgevana operates an infrastructure-gated, algorithmically ranked staking product. No public edgeSOL DAO or token-voting portal was verified.
SolStrategies
STKESOL
Non-DAO administration
SolStrategies is a public corporation operating a stake-pool product. Its shareholder and board governance must not be described as a crypto token DAO.
Layer33
IndieSOL · ORE
No public DAO found
Layer33 describes a curated independent-validator coalition and IndieSOL stake pool. Neither IndieSOL nor the related ORE incentive is documented as a Layer33 governance token.
Shinobi
xSHIN
No public DAO found
Shinobi xSHIN is a performance-selected stake pool. No public xSHIN DAO, governance token, or proposal portal was verified.
Raiku
rkuSOL · RAIKU
Planned token; no public DAO
rkuSOL is live as a staking receipt, while Raiku's referenced future token had no verified live mint, voting system, or public DAO in this snapshot.
Historical boundary
Lido on Solana is closed, while Lido DAO continues
Lido
Historical product; DAO active
Lido DAO remains active across the broader protocol, but Lido on Solana was sunset and stSOL is a historical product rather than a current Solana stake-pool opportunity.
Lido on Solana completed its sunset path; the broader Lido DAO continues independently of the closed Solana product.
Reproducibility
Methodology and tracking
Daily read-only signal collection
A scheduled collector checks proposal metadata from four allowlisted public JSON/API sources. It saves a short-lived review artifact only: no source body, wallet, secret, automatic classification, site publication, vote, commit, push, or deployment is performed. Authoritative on-chain, gauge, and futarchy state remains a separate manual check.
4 automatic metadata sources
6 authoritative manual checks
- SolBlaze Realms ↗ — Check proposal state, voting, execution, and governance settings.
- SolBlaze gauges ↗ — Check the live gauge epoch and validator weights.
- Marinade Realms ↗ — Check proposal state, delegation, execution, and governance settings.
- Jito governance portal ↗ — Check the custom Realms deployment for authoritative proposal state.
- Vault veV gauges ↗ — Check the seven-day gauge epoch and weights; this is limited-scope stake-allocation governance.
- Sanctum futarchy portal ↗ — Check market status and resolution; CLOUD governance does not control rkuSOL validator selection.
How this snapshot was classified
- Start with the 15-program stake-pool registry, then add the supplemental rkuSOL record, directly associated Sanctum governance, and historical Lido on Solana.
- Prefer official documentation, governance interfaces, proposal forums and repositories, token disclosures, and canonical mint or contract references.
- Separate receipt, governance, utility, voting-power, and incentive roles. Do not infer voting rights from a ticker, treasury allocation, or generic use of “governance.”
- Record the latest activity that was visible on the checked date. A quiet public surface does not by itself prove a DAO is inactive.
- Publish treasury evidence and caveats, never inferred or stale live balances.
Signals to monitor next
- Realms and on-chain governance: proposal creation, voting, quorum, completion, execution, and configuration changes.
- Marinade and Jito forums: new MIP/JIP discussions and formal status changes through public feeds or APIs.
- SolBlaze proposal repository: new SBGP files and material revisions, paired with the corresponding on-chain vote.
- Vault gauges and Sanctum futarchy: epoch or market state, voting weights, closing state, and execution evidence.
- Official documentation: token, lockup, delegation, treasury-control, and participation-rule changes.
Social posts can provide alerts, but the tracker should use a governance portal, repository, on-chain record, or official documentation as the source of record.